Climate non-stationarity – Validity of calibrated rainfall–runoff models for use in climate change studies
- 6 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Hydrology
- Vol. 394 (3-4), 447-457
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.018
Abstract
This paper presents results from a modelling study carried out to investigate whether the calibrated parameter values for rainfall–runoff models based on historical observed data can be used to reliably predict runoff responses to changes in future climate inputs. The modelling experiments are carried out for four rainfall–runoff models using long records of historical daily climate and streamflow data from 61 catchments in southeast Australia. The results indicate that the models, when calibrated using more than 20 years of data, can generally be used for climate impact studies where the future mean annual rainfall is not more than 15% drier or 20% wetter than the mean annual rainfall in the model calibration period. It is generally more difficult for a model calibrated over a wet period to predict runoff over a dry period compared to a model calibrated over a dry period to predict runoff over a wet period. For southeast Australia, there is a good reason to use the recent records to calibrate rainfall–runoff models to represent the current prolonged drought over the region and for climate change impact studies where the large majority of climate models predict a drier future across this region.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A two‐parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflowWater Resources Research, 2007
- Assessment of soil-based and calibrated parameters of the Sacramento model and parameter transferabilityJournal of Hydrology, 2005
- Predicting the effects of landuse change on water and salt balance—a case study of a catchment affected by dryland salinity in NSW, AustraliaJournal of Hydrology, 2003
- Modelling the impacts of climate change on Australian streamflowHydrological Processes, 2002
- On explanatory depth and predictive powerHydrological Processes, 2001
- Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchmentsJournal of Hydrology, 2001
- Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrologyJournal of Hydrology, 1983
- River flow forecasting through conceptual models part II - The Brosna catchment at FerbaneJournal of Hydrology, 1970
- River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principlesJournal of Hydrology, 1970
- An Automatic Method for Finding the Greatest or Least Value of a FunctionThe Computer Journal, 1960