Analysis of the Static Function of the Popliteus Tendon and Evaluation of an Anatomic Reconstruction
- 30 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 38 (3), 543-549
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509349493
Abstract
Background The popliteus tendon has important dynamic and static stabilizing functions at the knee. Evaluation of its static role as the “fifth ligament” of the knee and a subsequent analysis of a popliteus tendon reconstruction has not been performed. Hypothesis In vitro knee stability can be restored to a popliteus tendon—deficient knee with an anatomic popliteus tendon reconstruction. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Eleven nonpaired cadaveric knees were tested under the following popliteus tendon states: intact, sectioned, and reconstructed using an autogenous semitendinosus graft. Each knee was subjected to 10-N·m varus moments, 5-N·m external and internal torques, and 88-N anterior and posterior loads at flexion angles of 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. A 6 degrees of freedom electromagnetic motion tracking system was used to assess motion changes of the tibia with respect to the femur. Results Significant increases in external rotation and small but significant increases in internal rotation, varus angulation, and anterior translation motion were found after sectioning the popliteus tendon compared to the intact state. Significant decreases in external rotation were found in the reconstructed state compared with the sectioned state at knee flexion angles of 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. Comparing the reconstructed state to the intact state, there were no significant differences at knee flexion angles of 0° and 20°, but significant decreases of external rotation were found at knee flexion angles of 30°, 60°, and 90°. Additionally, there were small but significant differences between the reconstructed and intact state with respect to varus angulation at knee flexion angles of 20°, 30°, and 60°; anterior translation at 20° and 30°; and internal rotation at all flexion angles. Conclusion The popliteus tendon has important primary stabilization roles at the knee. The authors also found that an anatomic popliteus tendon reconstruction significantly reduced the increase in external rotation that occurred with sectioning the popliteus tendon; however, differences seen with respect to internal rotation, varus angulation, and anterior translation were not restored. Clinical Significance The popliteus tendon functions essentially as the fifth major ligament of the knee. An anatomic popliteus tendon reconstruction can restore external rotation stability to knees with popliteus tendon injury.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medial Knee Injury: Part 1, Static Function of the Individual Components of the Main Medial Knee StructuresThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Force Measurements on the Posterior Oblique Ligament and Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Proximal and Distal Divisions to Applied LoadsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- Biomechanical Analysis of an Isolated Fibular (Lateral) Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Autogenous Semitendinosus GraftThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- MR imaging of the posterolateral corner of the kneeSkeletal Radiology, 2007
- Popliteus tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literatureBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003
- The Effect of Release of the Popliteus and Quadriceps Force on Rotation of the KneeClinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2003
- The Effects of a Popliteus Muscle Load on In Situ Forces in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and on Knee KinematicsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1998
- Three‐dimensional kinematics of glenohumeral elevationJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1991
- Isolated rupture of the popliteus tendon in a professional athleteArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1990
- Functions of the Popliteus Muscle in ManThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1971