What dentition assures oral function?
- 18 June 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Vol. 18 (s3), 34-45
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01436.x
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between dentition and oral function. Material and methods: A search of the English literature was undertaken using PubMed and appropriate keywords. Citations were identified and hand sorted to confirm their validity against our inclusion criteria. Four specific areas of oral function were addressed; (I) masticatory function, (II) aesthetics, satisfaction and psychosocial ability, (III) occlusal support and stability and (IV) other functionality including tactile perception, phonetics and taste. Results: From an initial pool of 1460 citations, 83 articles met the inclusion criteria. These were summarized and relevant data extracted for incorporation into the review. Masticatory efficiency (assessed as comminution efficiency) and masticatory ability (self‐reported) are both linked to the number of teeth. A minimum of 20 teeth with nine to 10 pairs of contacting units (including anterior teeth) is associated with adequate efficiency and ability. Tooth numbers below that level yield impaired masticatory efficiency and are likely to result in reduction in reported masticatory ability. Aesthetics and satisfaction are markedly impaired with loss of anterior teeth. Satisfaction is most likely to be achieved in people who also retain a premolar dentition. Further, there is little increase in satisfaction seen in subjects who retained molar teeth. However, there are marked variations in subjective measures of aesthetics and psychosocial comfort between age groups, social classes, cultures, regions and countries. For most people, occlusal support and stability are obtained with three to four functional posterior units with a symmetrical pattern of tooth loss or five to six units with an asymmetrical pattern. There was no relationship between occlusal factors and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Phonetics may be maintained even with large anterior restorations. Patients generally attribute a low significance to phonetics, tactile perception and taste compared with mastication and appearance. Conclusions: The World Health Organization goal for the year 2000, namely to maintain a natural dentition of not less than 20 teeth throughout life, is substantiated by the current literature review as this proposed dentition will assure an acceptable level of oral function.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient evaluation of treatment with fixed implant‐ supported partial denturesJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2001
- Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brinemark implants. A 3‐year follow‐up study in private dental practices.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1997
- A Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of the Risk and Relative Odds of Temporomandibular Disorders as a Function of Common Occlusal FeaturesJournal of Dental Research, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Shortened dental arches and masticatory abilityJournal of Dentistry, 1990
- Oral comfort in shortened dental arches*Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1990
- The effect of removable partial dentures on the oral function in shortened dental arches*Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1989
- Occlusal relationship in patients with pain‐dysfunction symptoms in the temporomandibular jointsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1983
- Relationship between dental state and dietary intake in 70‐year‐old males and females in Göteborg, Sweden: a population study*Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1982
- Nutritional Status of Medical Patients on Emergency Admission to HospitalActa Medica Scandinavica, 1982