Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Top Cited Papers
- 13 September 2000
- journal article
- the medical-literature
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association
- Vol. 284 (10), 1290-1296
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.10.1290
Abstract
This series provides clinicians with strategies and tools to interpret and integrate evidence from published research in their care of patients. The 2 key principles for applying all the articles in this series to patient care relate to the value-laden nature of clinical decisions and to the hierarchy of evidence postulated by evidence-based medicine. Clinicians need to be able to distinguish high from low quality in primary studies, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and other integrative research focused on management recommendations. An evidence-based practitioner must also understand the patient's circumstances or predicament; identify knowledge gaps and frame questions to fill those gaps; conduct an efficient literature search; critically appraise the research evidence; and apply that evidence to patient care. However, treatment judgments often reflect clinician or societal values concerning whether intervention benefits are worth the cost. Many unanswered questions concerning how to elicit preferences and how to incorporate them in clinical encounters constitute an enormously challenging frontier for evidence-based medicine. Time limitation remains the biggest obstacle to evidence-based practice but clinicians should seek evidence from as high in the appropriate hierarchy of evidence as possible, and every clinical decision should be geared toward the particular circumstances of the patient.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practitioners of evidence based careBMJ, 2000
- Randomized trials versus observational studies in adolescent pregnancy preventionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic reviewBMJ, 1999
- Increased Mortality Associated with Growth Hormone Treatment in Critically Ill AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureXVI. How to Use a Treatment RecommendationJAMA, 1999
- The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1998
- Randomised trial of α-tocopherol and β-carotene supplements on incidence of major coronary events in men with previous myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1997
- Randomised study of effect of ibopamine on survival in patients with advanced severe heart failureThe Lancet, 1997
- Randomised study of n of 1 trials versus standard practiceBMJ, 1996
- Determining Optimal Therapy — Randomized Trials in Individual PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986