Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion
- 31 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 11 (8), 945-951
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80136-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditionsJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1992
- Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical resultsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1987
- The effect of proximally and fully porous‐coated canine hip stem design on bone modelingJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1987
- The biologic interface between bone and cementless femoral endoprosthesesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1986
- Formation of a synovial‐like membrane at the bone‐cement interface: Its role in bone resorption and implant loosening after total hip replacementArthritis & Rheumatism, 1986
- Osseointegrated Titanium Implants:Requirements for Ensuring a Long-Lasting, Direct Bone-to-Implant Anchorage in ManActa Orthopaedica, 1981