Public policy experimentation: Lessons from America
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Policy Studies
- Vol. 19 (2), 93-114
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01442879808423746
Abstract
The years from the early 1960s to the late 1980s in the United States represent a unique era in the history of public policy experimentation. During these years a number of social programmes were implemented and evaluated using the ‘medical’ model of the randomised controlled trial design. The reasons for the widespread acceptance among policy‐makers of this approach to evaluation included recognition of the chaos and inefficiency in existing welfare services, and the consequent need to adopt a more rational means of solving policy issues; a government mandate specifying that a proportion of social programme budgets be devoted to evaluation; a long‐standing tradition of social experimentation among behavioural scientists; and the conceptual and methodological tools for applying experimental models of evaluation to the social domain. The paper examines nine public policy experiments carried out during this period in the fields of income maintenance, employment‐support and penal policy. These experiments demonstrate that rigorous evaluations of public policy programmes can be carried out using a randomised controlled design. Other lessons to be drawn from the ‘golden era’ of evaluation in the USA are the complex relationship between research findings and policy; the changing nature of the social contexts in which such experiments are done; the need to include process and qualitative data, and to consider research participants as active agents rather than merely as passive subjects; and the importance of involving different social science disciplines in evaluating different approaches to public policy.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The efficacy of health promotion, health economics and late modernismHealth Education Research, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995
- POLICY ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION RESEARCH AFTER TWENTY YEARSPolicy Studies Journal, 1987
- Rent SubsidiesEvaluation Review, 1986
- COMPARISON OF HEALTH OUTCOMES AT A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION WITH THOSE OF FEE-FOR-SERVICE CAREThe Lancet, 1986
- A Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Prepaid Group Practice on Use of ServicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Effects of Negative Income Tax Programs on Marital DissolutionThe Journal of Human Resources, 1980
- Experimental Sociology in the United StatesSocial Forces, 1931
- Experimental Sociology: A Preliminary Note on Theory and MethodSocial Forces, 1929