Surgery versus sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins
- 18 October 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Emergencias
- Vol. 2021 (9), CD004980
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004980
Abstract
Varicose veins are a relatively common condition and account for around 54,000 in‐patient hospital episodes per year. The two most common interventions for varicose veins are surgery and sclerotherapy. However, there is little comparative data regarding their effectiveness. To identify whether the use of surgery or sclerotherapy should be recommended for the management of primary varicose veins. Thirteen electronic bibliographic databases were searched covering biomedical, science, social science, health economic and grey literature (including current research). In addition, the reference lists of relevant articles were checked and various health services research‐related resources were consulted via the internet. These included health economics and HTA organisations, guideline producing agencies, generic research and trials registers, and specialist sites. All studies that were described as randomised controlled trials comparing surgery with sclerotherapy for the treatment of primary varicose veins were identified. Two authors independently extracted and summarised data from the eligible studies using a data extraction sheet for consistency. All studies were cross‐checked independently by the authors. A total of 2306 references were found from our searches, 61 of which were identified as potential trials comparing surgery and sclerotherapy. However, only nine randomised trials, described in a total of 14 separate papers, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Fifty trials were excluded and one trial is ongoing and is due for completion in 2004. The trials used a variety of outcome measures and classification systems which made direct comparison between trials difficult. However, the trend was for sclerotherapy to be evaluated as significantly better than surgery at one year; after one year (sclerotherapy resulted in worse outcomes) the benefits with sclerotherapy were less, and by three to five years surgery had better outcomes. The data on cost‐effectiveness was not adequately reported. There was insufficient evidence to preferentially recommend the use of sclerotherapy or surgery. There needs to be more research that specifically examines both costs and outcomes for surgery and sclerotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Foam-Sclerotherapy, Surgery, Sclerotherapy, and Combined Treatment for Varicose Veins: A 10-Year, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Trial (VEDICO Trial)Angiology, 2003
- Varicose vein surgery with preservation of the saphenous vein: A comparison between high ligation-avulsion versus saphenofemoral banding valvuloplasty-avulsionJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1994
- Correction of Superficial Incompetence with Selective Saphenous Vein Repair (SSVR)Vascular Surgery, 1993
- Long-Term Results of Sclerotherapy and Surgical Treatment of the Varicose Short Saphenous VeinThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1991
- Two Different Techniques for Sclerosing the Incompetent Saphenofemoral Junction: A Comparative StudyThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1990
- Postsclerotherapy Hyperpigmentations: A One‐Year Follow‐UpThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1990
- VARICOSE VEINS: A COMPARISON OF SURGERY AND INJECTION/COMPRESSION SCLEROTHERAPY: Five-year Follow-upThe Lancet, 1978
- A Comparison of Staples and Nylon Closure in Varicose Vein SurgeryVascular Surgery, 1975
- Surgery and Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Varicose VeinsArchives of Surgery, 1974
- VARICOSE VEINS: A COMPARISON OF SURGERY AND INJECTION/COMPRESSION SCLEROTHERAPYThe Lancet, 1972