Proning in Non-Intubated (PINI) in Times of COVID-19: Case Series and a Review
Open Access
- 7 July 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (8), 818-824
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620934801
Abstract
It has been well known for decades that prone positioning (PP) improves oxygenation. However, it has gained widespread acceptance only in the last few years since studies have shown significant survival benefit. Many centers have established prone ventilation in their treatment algorithm for mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Physiologically, PP should also benefit awake, non-intubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, proning in non-intubated (PINI) patients did not gain any momentum until a few months ago when the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surged. A large number of sick patients overwhelmed the health care system, and many centers faced a dearth of ventilators. In addition, outcomes of patients placed on mechanical ventilation because of COVID-19 infection have been highly variable and often dismal. Hence, increased focus has shifted to using various strategies to prevent intubation, such as PINI. There is accumulating evidence that PINI is a low-risk intervention that can be performed even outside intensive care unit with minimal assistance and may prevent intubation in certain patients with ARDS. It can also be performed safely at smaller centers and, therefore, may reduce the patient transfer to larger institutions that are overwhelmed in the current crisis. We present a case series of 2 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who experienced significant improvements in oxygenation with PP. In addition, the physiology of PP is described, and concerns such as proning in obese and patient’s anxiety are addressed; an educational pamphlet that may be useful for both patients and health care providers is provided.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Self‐Proning in Awake, Non‐intubated Patients in the Emergency Department: A Single ED’s Experience During the COVID‐19 PandemicAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2020
- Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational studyThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2020
- Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort studyCritical Care, 2020
- Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based reviewWorld Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2016
- Prone positioning improves oxygenation in spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: A retrospective studyJournal of Critical Care, 2015
- The gravitational distribution of ventilation-perfusion ratio is more uniform in prone than supine posture in the normal human lungJournal of Applied Physiology, 2013
- Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysisIntensive Care Medicine, 2010
- Effects of Systematic Prone Positioning in Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory FailureJAMA, 2004
- Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndromeEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2002