Timing of dialysis initiation in transplant-naive and failed transplant patients
Open Access
- 28 February 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature Reviews Nephrology
- Vol. 8 (5), 284-292
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.36
Abstract
Early initiation of dialysis has been recommended by guidelines over the past two decades, but recent studies and a randomized, controlled trial indicate that patients who start dialysis early might in fact have worse outcomes. The authors of this Review discuss studies of early and late dialysis initiation and highlight factors that influence the association between dialysis initiation and outcomes in transplant-naive patients with chronic kidney disease and in patients with a failed allograft. Over the past two decades, most guidelines have advocated early initiation of dialysis on the basis of studies showing improved survival in patients starting dialysis early. These recommendations led to an increase in the proportion of patients initiating dialysis with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >10 ml/min/1.73 m2, from 20% in 1996 to 52% in 2008. During this period, the percentage of patients starting dialysis with an eGFR ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m2 increased from 4% to 17%. However, recent studies have failed to substantiate a benefit of early dialysis initiation and some data have suggested worse outcomes for patients starting dialysis with a higher eGFR. Several reasons for this seemingly paradoxical observation have been suggested, including the fact that patients requiring early dialysis are likely to have more severe symptoms and comorbidities, leading to confounding by indication, as well as biological mechanisms that causally relate early dialysis therapy to adverse outcomes. Patients with a failing renal allograft who reinitiate dialysis encounter similar problems. However, unique factors associated with a failed allograft means that the optimal timing of dialysis initiation in failed transplant patients might differ from that in transplant-naive patients with chronic kidney disease. In this Review, we discuss studies of dialysis initiation and compare risks and benefits of early versus late initiation and reinitiation of dialysis therapy.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Associations of Body Mass Index and Weight Loss with Mortality in Transplant-Waitlisted Maintenance Hemodialysis PatientsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2011
- Impact of Dialysis Modality on Survival after Kidney Transplant FailureClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2011
- Novel Equations to Estimate Lean Body Mass in Maintenance Hemodialysis PatientsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2011
- Mid-Arm Muscle Circumference and Quality of Life and Survival in Maintenance Hemodialysis PatientsClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2010
- Timing of Dialysis Initiation and Survival in ESRDClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2010
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of DialysisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Serum Indoxyl Sulfate Is Associated with Vascular Disease and Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease PatientsClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Bicarbonate Supplementation Slows Progression of CKD and Improves Nutritional StatusJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- An integrated review of "unplanned" dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to "suboptimal" initiationBMC Nephrology, 2009
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976