The impacts of anthropogenic ocean noise on cetaceans and implications for management
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Vol. 85 (11), 1091-1116
- https://doi.org/10.1139/z07-101
Abstract
Ocean noise pollution is of special concern for cetaceans, as they are highly dependent on sound as their principal sense. Sound travels very efficiently underwater, so the potential area impacted can be thousands of square kilometres or more. The principal anthropogenic noise sources are underwater explosions (nuclear and otherwise), shipping, seismic exploration by mainly the oil and gas industries, and naval sonar operations. Strandings and mortalities of especially beaked whales (family Ziphiidae) have in many cases been conclusively linked to noise events such as naval maneuvers involving tactical sonars or seismic surveys, though other cetacean species may also be involved. The mechanisms behind this mortality are still unknown, but are most likely related to gas and fat emboli at least partially mediated by a behavioral response, such as a change in diving pattern. Estimated received sound levels in these events are typically not high enough to cause hearing damage, implying that the auditory system may not always be the best indicator for noise impacts. Beaked whales are found in small, possibly genetically isolated, local populations that are resident year-round. Thus, even transient and localized acoustic impacts can have prolonged and serious population consequences, as may have occurred following at least one stranding. Populations may also be threatened by noise through reactions such as increased stress levels, abandonment of important habitat, and “masking” or the obscuring of natural sounds. Documented changes in vocal behavior may lead to reductions in foraging efficiency or mating opportunities. Responses are highly variable between species, age classes, behavioral states, etc., making extrapolations problematic. Also, short-term responses may not be good proxies of long-term population-level impacts. There are many examples of apparent tolerance of noise by cetaceans, however. Noise can also affect cetaceans indirectly through their prey. Fish show permanent and temporary hearing loss, reduced catch rates, stress, and behavioral reactions to noise. Management implications of noise impacts include difficulties in establishing “safe” exposure levels, shortcomings of some mitigation tools, the need for precaution in the form of reducing noise levels and distancing noise from biologically important areas, and the role of marine protected areas and monitoring in safeguarding cetaceans especially from cumulative and synergistic effects.Keywords
This publication has 102 references indexed in Scilit:
- Killer whales and whaling: the scavenging hypothesisBiology Letters, 2005
- What Causes Lesions in Sperm Whale Bones?Science, 2005
- Influence of seismic shooting on the lesser sandeel (Ammodytes marinus)ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2004
- Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioningNature, 2002
- MITIGATING SEISMIC IMPACT ON MARINE LIFE: CURRENT PRACTICE AND FUTURE TECHNOLOGYBioacoustics, 2002
- Can Diving-induced Tissue Nitrogen Supersaturation Increase the Chance of Acoustically Driven Bubble Growth in Marine Mammals?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2001
- Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbanceBiological Conservation, 2001
- ICEBREAKER NOISE IN LANCASTER SOUND, N.W.T., CANADA: IMPLICATIONS FOR MARINE MAMMAL BEHAVIORMarine Mammal Science, 1993
- Effects of Sounds from a Geophysical Survey Device on Catch-per-Unit-Effort in a Hook-and-Line Fishery for Rockfish (Sebastes spp.)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1992
- Effects of Sounds from a Geophysical Survey Device on Behavior of Captive Rockfish (Sebastes spp.)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1992