Timing of Coronary Invasive Strategy in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Clinical Outcomes
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 9 (22), 2267-2276
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.017
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pretreatment with Prasugrel in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary SyndromesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Third Universal Definition of Myocardial InfarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012
- Optimal timing of invasive angiography in stable non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Leipzig Immediate versus early and late PercutaneouS coronary Intervention triAl in NSTEMI (LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial)European Heart Journal, 2011
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Early versus Delayed Invasive Intervention in Acute Coronary SyndromesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Prognostic Significance of Small Troponin I Rise After a Successful Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of a Native ArteryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2009
- Cost-effectiveness of early versus selectively invasive strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2009
- Immediate versus deferred coronary angioplasty in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromesHeart, 2008
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986