The Shock Index revisited – a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Critical Care
- Vol. 17 (4), R172
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12851
Abstract
Isolated vital signs (for example, heart rate or systolic blood pressure) have been shown unreliable in the assessment of hypovolemic shock. In contrast, the Shock Index (SI), defined by the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, has been advocated to better risk-stratify patients for increased transfusion requirements and early mortality. Recently, our group has developed a novel and clinical reliable classification of hypovolemic shock based upon four classes of worsening base deficit (BD). The objective of this study was to correlate this classification to corresponding strata of SI for the rapid assessment of trauma patients in the absence of laboratory parameters.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Renaissance of base deficit for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a base deficit-based classification for hypovolemic shock developed on data from 16,305 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®Critical Care, 2013
- Identifying Risk for Massive Transfusion in the Relatively Normotensive Patient: Utility of the Prehospital Shock IndexThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2011
- Identifying Life-Threatening Shock in the Older Injured Patient: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data BankThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2010
- Utility of the Shock Index in Predicting Mortality in Traumatically Injured PatientsThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- Acute Coagulopathy in Isolated Blunt Traumatic Brain InjuryNeurocritical Care, 2009
- Shock Index in the First Trimester of Pregnancy and Its Relationship to Ruptured Ectopic PregnancyAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2002
- Preventable deaths after injury: why are the traditional 'vital' signs poor indicators of blood loss?Emergency Medicine Journal, 1995
- A Comparison of the Shock Index and Conventional Vital Signs to Identify Acute, Critical Illness in the Emergency DepartmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus ConferenceCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- THE INJURY SEVERITY SCOREThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1974