Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methods
- 27 January 2001
- Vol. 322 (7280), 226-231
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1993
- Confounding in epidemiological studies: why "independent" effects may not be all they seem.BMJ, 1992
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1990
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and EvidenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.BMJ, 1983
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.Psychological Review, 1963
- The Influence of Statistical Methods for Research Workers on the Development of the Science of StatisticsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1951
- Tests of Significance Considered as EvidenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1942