Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: what have we learned?
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Ethics
- Vol. 4 (3), 125-130
- https://doi.org/10.1258/ce.2009.009018
Abstract
To date, few Norwegian clinical ethics committees (CECs) have included patients or next of kin in case discussions. In 2008, Rikshospitalet's (The National Hospital‘s) CEC began to routinely invite patients and relatives into case discussions. In this paper, we describe seven cases discussed by this committee in 2008. Six involved life and death decision-making in collaboration with the next of kin, while one related case did not include relatives. In our opinion, representing the patient's perspective was advantageous to the discussion itself, to the conclusion made and to the next of kin's acceptance of the resolution. We believe that if the patient had been represented in the last case, the outcome might have been different. We conclude that successful patient involvement will rely on well-structured case discussions, an open atmosphere and good preparation and follow-up.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot studyJournal of Medical Ethics, 2009
- Greater Patient, Family and Surrogate Involvement in Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Model of Clinical Ethics Liaison Service as a Measure for Preventive EthicsHEC Forum, 2007
- The Complex Roles of Relatives in End-of-Life Decision-Making: An Ethical AnalysisHEC Forum, 2007
- Empirical assessments of clinical ethics services: implications for clinical ethics committeesClinical Ethics, 2007
- Clinicians’ evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative studyMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2007
- Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committeeJournal of Medical Ethics, 2005
- Balancing the perspectives. The patient’s role in clinical ethics consultationMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2003
- Evaluation of a medical ethics consultation service: Opinions of patients and health care providersAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1996