Clinical Accuracy of 3 Different Types of Computed Tomography-Derived Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Implant Placement
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Vol. 67 (2), 394-401
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography‐guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgeryJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2007
- Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implantsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2006
- Use of Stereolithographic Templates for Surgical and Prosthodontic Implant Planning and Placement. Part I. The ConceptJournal of Prosthodontics, 2006
- An Image-Guided System-Drilled Surgical Template and Trephine Guide Pin to Make Treatment of Completely Edentulous Patients Easier: A Clinical Report on Immediate LoadingClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2004
- Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomographyDento maxillo facial radiology, 2000
- Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgeryDento maxillo facial radiology, 1999
- Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants.Dento maxillo facial radiology, 1999
- Why Do Dental Implants Fail? Part IImplant Dentistry, 1999
- Custom-made cast titanium implants produced with CAD/CAM for the reconstruction of cranium defectsInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1998
- A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 1994