Development of a minimization instrument for allocation of a hospital-level performance improvement intervention to reduce waiting times in Ontario emergency departments
Open Access
- 8 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 4 (1), 32-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-32
Abstract
Background Rigorous evaluation of an intervention requires that its allocation be unbiased with respect to confounders; this is especially difficult in complex, system-wide healthcare interventions. We developed a short survey instrument to identify factors for a minimization algorithm for the allocation of a hospital-level intervention to reduce emergency department (ED) waiting times in Ontario, Canada. Methods Potential confounders influencing the intervention's success were identified by literature review, and grouped by healthcare setting specific change stages. An international multi-disciplinary (clinical, administrative, decision maker, management) panel evaluated these factors in a two-stage modified-delphi and nominal group process based on four domains: change readiness, evidence base, face validity, and clarity of definition. Results An original set of 33 factors were identified from the literature. The panel reduced the list to 12 in the first round survey. In the second survey, experts scored each factor according to the four domains; summary scores and consensus discussion resulted in the final selection and measurement of four hospital-level factors to be used in the minimization algorithm: improved patient flow as a hospital's leadership priority; physicians' receptiveness to organizational change; efficiency of bed management; and physician incentives supporting the change goal. Conclusion We developed a simple tool designed to gather data from senior hospital administrators on factors likely to affect the success of a hospital patient flow improvement intervention. A minimization algorithm will ensure balanced allocation of the intervention with respect to these factors in study hospitals.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? YesBMJ, 2008
- Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? NoBMJ, 2008
- Creating Sustained Improvements in Patient Access and Flow: Experiences from Three Ontario Healthcare InstitutionsWorld Health & Population, 2008
- Assessing organisational readiness for change: use of diagnostic analysis prior to the implementation of a multidisciplinary assessment for acute stroke careImplementation Science, 2007
- The Impact of Organizational Culture on Clinical Managers' Organizational Commitment and Turnover IntentionsJona: the Journal of Nursing Administration, 2007
- Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health careBMJ, 2007
- Differential Effects of Pretraining Influences on Readiness to ChangeThe Journal of Psychology, 2007
- ICES Report: Benchmarking Patient Delays in Ontario's Emergency Departments: What Are We Waiting For?World Health & Population, 2005
- Regulating hospital use: length of stay, beds and whiteboardsNursing Inquiry, 2005
- The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1974