A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Critical Care
- Vol. 20 (1), 12-19
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.09.007
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS11902-01)
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Cox and Gray’s survival models in severe sepsis*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Intensive care unit survivors have fewer hospital readmissions and readmission days than other hospitalized patients in British ColumbiaCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Prognostic factors for mortality following interhospital transfers to the medical intensive care unit of a tertiary referral centerCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Resources and use of the intensive care unit in patients who undergo surgery for ovarian carcinomaCancer, 2002
- Further evidence concerning the use of a clinical comorbidity index with ICD-9-CM administrative dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: A responseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985