Polyphasic approach of bacterial classification — An overview of recent advances
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Indian Journal of Microbiology
- Vol. 47 (2), 98-108
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0022-x
Abstract
Classification of microorganisms on the basis of traditional microbiological methods (morphological, physiological and biochemical) creates a blurred image about their taxonomic status and thus needs further clarification. It should be based on a more pragmatic approach of deploying a number of methods for the complete characterization of microbes. Hence, the methods now employed for bacterial systematics include, the complete 16S rRNA gene sequencing and its comparative analysis by phylogenetic trees, DNA-DNA hybridization studies with related organisms, analyses of molecular markers and signature pattern(s), biochemical assays, physiological and morphological tests. Collectively these genotypic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic methods for determining taxonomic position of microbes constitute what is known as the ‘polyphasic approach’ for bacterial systematics. This approach is currently the most popular choice for classifying bacteria and several microbes, which were previously placed under invalid taxa have now been resolved into new genera and species. This has been possible owing to rapid development in molecular biological techniques, automation of DNA sequencing coupled with advances in bioinformatic tools and access to sequence databases. Several DNA-based typing methods are known; these provide information for delineating bacteria into different genera and species and have the potential to resolve differences among the strains of a species. Therefore, newly isolated strains must be classified on the basis of the polyphasic approach. Also previously classified organisms, as and when required, can be reclassified on this ground in order to obtain information about their accurate position in the microbial world. Thus, current techniques enable microbiologists to decipher the natural phylogenetic relationships between microbes.Keywords
This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: comparative-genomics-based discoveriesFunctional & Integrative Genomics, 2006
- Re-evaluating prokaryotic speciesNature Reviews Microbiology, 2005
- Reclassification of Amycolatopsis mediterranei DSM 46095 as Amycolatopsis rifamycinica sp. nov.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2004
- From Gene Trees to Organismal Phylogeny in Prokaryotes:The Case of the γ-ProteobacteriaPLoS Biology, 2003
- A Phylogenomic Approach to Bacterial Phylogeny: Evidence of a Core of Genes Sharing a Common HistoryGenome Research, 2002
- Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial SystematicsInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1987
- Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresisCell, 1984
- Heterologous protein—RNA interactions in bacterial ribosomesFEBS Letters, 1973
- Activities of B. stearothermophilus 50 S ribosomes reconstituted with prokaryotic and eukaryotic 5 S RNAFEBS Letters, 1973
- The formation of hybrid DNA molecules and their use in studies of DNA homologiesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1961