Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement
- 23 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 16 (12), 2118-2125
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0473-0
Abstract
PMMA is the most common bone substitute used for vertebroplasty. An increased fracture rate of the adjacent vertebrae has been observed after vertebroplasty. Decreased failure strength has been noted in a laboratory study of augmented functional spine units (FSUs), where the adjacent, non-augmented vertebral body always failed. This may provide evidence that rigid cement augmentation may facilitate the subsequent collapse of the adjacent vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the decrease in failure strength of augmented FSUs can be avoided using low-modulus PMMA bone cement. In cadaveric FSUs, overall stiffness, failure strength and stiffness of the two vertebral bodies were determined under compression for both the treated and untreated specimens. Augmentation was performed on the caudal vertebrae with either regular or low-modulus PMMA. Endplate and wedge-shaped fractures occurred in the cranial and caudal vertebrae in the ratios endplate:wedge (cranial:caudal): 3:8 (5:6), 4:7 (7:4) and 10:1 (10:1) for control, low-modulus and regular cement group, respectively. The mean failure strength was 3.3 ± 1 MPa with low-modulus cement, 2.9 ± 1.2 MPa with regular cement and 3.6 ± 1.3 MPa for the control group. Differences between the groups were not significant (p = 0.754 and p = 0.375, respectively, for low-modulus cement vs. control and regular cement vs. control). Overall FSU stiffness was not significantly affected by augmentation. Significant differences were observed for the stiffness differences of the cranial to the caudal vertebral body for the regular PMMA group to the other groups (p < 0.003). The individual vertebral stiffness values clearly showed the stiffening effect of the regular cement and the lesser alteration of the stiffness of the augmented vertebrae using the low-modulus PMMA compared to the control group (p = 0.999). In vitro biomechanical study and biomechanical evaluation of the hypothesis state that the failure strength of augmented functional spine units could be better preserved using low-modulus PMMA in comparison to regular PMMA cement.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniquesClinical Biomechanics, 2005
- Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element studyEuropean Spine Journal, 2003
- The Effect of Cement Augmentation on the Load Transfer in an Osteoporotic Functional Spinal UnitSpine, 2003
- Material Changes in Osteoporotic Human Cancellous Bone Following Infiltration with Acrylic Bone Cement for a Vertebral Cement AugmentationComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2003
- Mechanical Properties of Adult Vertebral Cancellous Bone: Correlation With Collagen Intermolecular Cross‐LinksJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2002
- Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2002
- Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early resultsEuropean Spine Journal, 2000
- Intravertebral body reconstruction with an injectablein situ-setting carbonated apatite: Biomechanical evaluation of a minimally invasive techniqueJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1999
- Vertebral fracture epidemiologyBone, 1996
- Vertebral fractures.BMJ, 1992