That's not funny: Understanding recipients' responses to teasing
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Western Journal of Communication
- Vol. 60 (4), 337-357
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319609374553
Abstract
This study examines factors that influence recipients' responses to being teased. We analyzed the effect of tease topics, recipients' perceptions of the teaser's intent, and cues used by the recipients to determine intent. Participants reported they were the recipients of six types of teases: (1) things said, (2) appearance, (3) romance/sex, (4) abilities, (5) teasing, and (6) identity. Respondents indicated that they relied upon four different cues to determine the teaser's intent: (1) background knowledge, (2) context, (3) paralinguistics, and (4) self. Global analysis revealed a three‐way interaction between cue, perception, and response. Local significance tests suggested that background cues contributed the most to this interaction and that negative and neutral responses had the largest effects. Specifically, respondents were more likely to perceive humorous intent overall, and they were more likely to respond positively when they ascribed humorous intent. However, when participants perceived serious intent, they were more likely to respond negatively. Of the four cues, self appeared to be the strongest mediator between respondents' perceptions of intent and their responses.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Inferential/Strategic Explanation for the Social Organisation of TeasesJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1992
- Forms and Functions of Intimate Play in Personal RelationshipsHuman Communication Research, 1992
- The effects of type of predicament and embarrassability on remedial responses to embarrassing situationsCommunication Quarterly, 1992
- Social Construction of TeasingJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1989
- An analysis of couples’ conversational complaintsCommunication Monographs, 1988
- Achieving 'Unmarkedness' in Organisational Discourse: A Praxis Perspective on Ethnolinguistic IdentityJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1987
- Po-faced receipts of teasesLinguistics, 1987
- The Social Contexts of HumorJournal of Communication, 1976
- The role of perceived versus actual attack in human physical aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
- Attribution of intent.Psychological Bulletin, 1969