The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas.
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Learning & Education
- Vol. 6 (1), 128-136
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.24401710
Abstract
Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: A manuscript should be reviewed on an “as is” basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees, and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own the ideas in their publications.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Becoming Vanilla PuddingJournal of Management Inquiry, 2005
- Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contributionJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005
- From the EditorAcademy of Management Learning & Education, 2005
- Some predictors ofSMJ article impactStrategic Management Journal, 2005
- Educating RitaAcademy of Management Learning & Education, 2004
- Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management DisciplineAcademy of Management Learning & Education, 2004
- The Manuscript Review ProcessJournal of Management Inquiry, 2003
- The Publishing Process: The Struggle for MeaningPublished by SAGE Publications ,1996
- Do citations matter?Journal of Information Science, 1994
- The Economic Approach to Human BehaviorPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1976