New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume
Open Access
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 34 (5), 556-565
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7327
Abstract
Objectives The main goal of this study was to determine the accuracy and precision of new fetal weight estimation models, based on fractional limb volume and conventional two‐dimensional (2D) sonographic measurements during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional study of 271 fetuses was performed using three‐dimensional ultrasonography to extract standard measurements—biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femoral diaphysis length (FDL)—plus fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol) within 4 days of delivery. Weighted multiple linear regression analysis was used to develop ‘modified Hadlock’ models and new models using transformed predictors that included soft tissue parameters for estimating birth weight. Estimated and observed birth weights were compared using mean percent difference (systematic weight estimation error) and the SD of the percent differences (random weight estimation error). The proportion of newborns with estimated birth weight within 5 or 10% of actual birth weight were compared using McNemar's test. Results Birth weights in the study group ranged from 235 to 5790 g, with equal proportions of male and female infants. Six new fetal weight estimation models were compared with the results for modified Hadlock models with sample‐specific coefficients. All the new models were very accurate, with mean percent differences that were not significantly different from zero. Model 3 (which used the natural logarithms of BPD, AC and AVol) and Model 6 (which used the natural logarithms of BPD, AC and TVol) provided the most precise weight estimations (random error = 6.6% of actual birth weight) as compared with 8.5% for the best original Hadlock model and 7.6% for a modified Hadlock model using sample‐specific coefficients. Model 5 (which used the natural logarithms of AC and TVol) classified an additional 9.1% and 8.3% of the fetuses within 5% and 10% of actual birth weight and Model 6 classified an additional 7.3% and 4.1% of infants within 5% and 10% of actual birth weight. Conclusion The precision of fetal weight estimation can be improved by adding fractional limb volume measurements to conventional 2D biometry. New models that consider fractional limb volume may offer novel insight into the contribution of soft tissue development to weight estimation. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Newborn Adiposity Measured by Plethysmography Is Not Predicted by Late Gestation Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Measures of Fetal Growth ,Journal of Nutrition, 2009
- Fractional limb volume – a soft tissue parameter of fetal body composition: validation, technical considerations and normal ranges during pregnancyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body compositionUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Could birthweight prediction models be improved by adding fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness?Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2008
- Tracing the origins of “fetal origins” of adult diseases: Programming by oxidative stress?Medical Hypotheses, 2006
- The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesisAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnanciesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Fetal weight estimation by three‐dimensional ultrasoundUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Intra-Uterine Weight Curves Obtained by UltrasoundActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1986
- Validation of Regression Models: Methods and ExamplesTechnometrics, 1977