Global Palliative Care and Cross-National Comparison: How Is Palliative Care Development Assessed?
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 22 (5), 580-590
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0510
Abstract
Background: Indicators assessing national-level palliative care (PC) development used for cross-national comparison depict progress on this field. There is current interest on its inclusion in global monitoring frameworks. Objective: Identify and conceptualize those most frequently used for international PC development reporting. Design: Systematic review. Data Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Google targeting national-level development indicators used for cross-national comparison. Additional search requesting experts' suggestions on key studies and “snow-balling” on reference section of all included studies. Identified indicators were listed and categorized in dimensions: services, use of medicines, policy, and education. Results: Fifty-four studies were included. Development has been evaluated using 480 different formulations of 165 indicators, 38 were highly reported. Thirty-two fell into proposed dimensions, 11 for use of medicines, 9 for policy, 7 for services, and 5 for education. Six into complementary dimensions: research, professional activity, and international cooperation. Six were the most frequently used indicators: number of PC services per population (40 reports), existence of PC national plan, strategy, or program (25), existence of palliative medicine specialization (22), availability and allocation of funds for PC (13), medical schools, including PC, in undergraduate curricula (13), and total use of opioids-morphine equivalents (11). Conclusion: There is a clear pattern for national-level PC development evaluation repeatedly using a small number of indicators. Indicators addressing generalistic provision, integration into health systems, and specific fields such as pediatric lack. This study invites international discussion on a global consensus on PC-development assessment.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of legislation, regulations and national health strategies for palliative care in seven European countries (Results from the Europall Research Group): a descriptive studyBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Using a Morphine Equivalence Metric to Quantify Opioid Consumption: Examining the Capacity to Provide Effective Treatment of Debilitating Pain at the Global, Regional, and Country LevelsJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2013
- Multivariate analysis of countries’ government and health-care system influences on opioid availability for cancer pain relief and palliative care: More than a function of human developmentPalliative Medicine, 2012
- Mapping Levels of Palliative Care Development: A Global UpdateJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012
- Pediatric palliative care provision around the world: A systematic reviewPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2011
- Availability of palliative care services for children with cancer in economically diverse regions of the worldEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Europe: a report from the ESMO/EAPC Opioid Policy InitiativeAnnals Of Oncology, 2010
- Disparities in the Contribution of Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Palliative Care ResearchJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2010
- The Public Health Strategy for Palliative CareJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2007