The application of contrast explanation to energy policy research: UK nuclear energy policy 2002–2012
- 16 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Energy Policy
- Vol. 55, 602-616
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.046
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Romanian nuclear new build: Progress amidst turbulence 1990–2010Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2012
- The Politics of Crisis Policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear Energy PolicyPolicy Studies Journal, 2008
- The Revival of Nuclear Power: An Analysis of the Legal ImplicationsJournal of Environmental Law, 2006
- Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: reorienting economics into social scienceCambridge Journal of Economics, 2006
- Nuclear power and the characteristics of ‘ordinariness’—the case of UK energy policyEnergy Policy, 2004
- Inherent Rule Variability in Consumer Choice: Changing Rules for Change's SakeJournal of Consumer Research, 2002
- Persistent demi-regs and robust tendencies: critical realism and the Singer-Prebisch ThesisCambridge Journal of Economics, 2002
- Scottish devolution and environmental lawJournal of Environmental Law, 2000
- The Politics of Regulatory Reform and The Future Direction of Nuclear Energy PolicyReview of Policy Research, 1985
- Limits to energy policy analysis — a reply to WeinbergEnergy Policy, 1980