Similar Survival but Better Function for Patients after Limb Salvage versus Amputation for Distal Tibia Osteosarcoma
Open Access
- 1 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 470 (6), 1735-1748
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2238-7
Abstract
Amputation has been the standard surgical treatment for distal tibia osteosarcoma. Advances in surgery and chemotherapy have made limb salvage possible. However, it is unclear whether limb salvage offers any improvement in function without compromising survival. We therefore compared the survival, local recurrence, function, and complications of patients with distal tibia osteosarcoma treated with limb salvage or amputation. We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients with distal tibia osteosarcoma treated from 1985 to 2010. Nineteen patients had amputations and 23 had limb salvage and allograft reconstructions. We graded the histology using Broders classification, and staged patients using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) systems. The tumor grades tended to be higher in the group of patients who had amputations. We determined survival, local recurrence, MSTS function, and complications. The minimum followup was 8 months (median, 60 months; range, 8–288 months). The survival of patients who had limb salvage was similar to that of patients who had amputations: 84% at 120 and 240 months versus 74%, respectively. The incidence of local recurrence was similar: three of 23 patients who had limb salvage versus no patients who had amputations. The mean MSTS functional score tended to be higher in patients who had limb salvage compared with those who had amputations: 76% (range, 30%–93%) versus 71% (range, 50%–87%), respectively. The incidence of complications was similar. Patients treated with either limb salvage or amputation experience similar survival, local recurrence, and complications, but better function is achievable for patients treated with limb salvage versus amputation. Local recurrence and complications are more common in patients with limb salvage. Level III, retrospective comparative study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal tibia and ankle joint after resection of primary bone tumoursThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2009
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Quality of Life Implications as a Consequence of Surgery: Limb Salvage, Primary and Secondary AmputationSarcoma, 2001
- The Two-Stage Ipsilateral Fibular Transfer for Tibial Defect Following Tumour ExcisionSarcoma, 2000
- CorrespondenceThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1998
- Influence of Ankle Ligaments on Tibial Rotation: An In Vitro StudyFoot & Ankle International, 1996
- Influence of Ligament Transection on Tibial and Calcaneal Rotation with Loading and Dorsi-PlantarflexionFoot & Ankle International, 1995
- Ankle Resection Arthrodesis in Patients with Bone TumorsFoot & Ankle International, 1994
- Analysis of Foot Position in Ankle Arthrodesis and Its Influence on GaitFoot & Ankle, 1980
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958