Heparin Thromboprophylaxis in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 41 (9), 2088-2098
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828cf104
Abstract
Objective: Venous thromboembolism prevention during critical illness is a widely used quality metric. The objective of this systematic review was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of heparin thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical patients in the ICU. Data Sources: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Clinicaltrials.gov, and personal files through May 2012. Study Selection: Randomized trials in adult medical-surgical ICU patients comparing any heparin (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin) with each other or no anticoagulant prophylaxis, evaluating deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, or mortality. Data Extraction: Independently, in duplicate, we abstracted trial characteristics, outcomes, and risk of bias. Data Synthesis: Seven trials involved 7,226 patients. Any heparin thromboprophylaxis compared with placebo reduced rates of deep vein thrombosis (pooled risk ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.41, 0.63]; p < 0.0001; I-2 = 77%) and pulmonary embolism (risk ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28, 0.97]; p = 0.04; I-2 = 0%) but not symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.59, 1.25]; p = 0.43). Major bleeding (risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.56, 1.21]; p = 0.32; I-2 = 50%) and mortality (risk ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78, 1.02]; p = 0.09; I-2 = 0%) rates were similar. Compared with unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin reduced rates of pulmonary embolism (risk ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.39, 1.00]; p = 0.05; I-2 = 53%) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (risk ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.34, 0.97]; p = 0.04) but not deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.74, 1.08]; p = 0.26; I-2 = 0%), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60, 1.25]; p = 0.44; I-2 = 0%), major bleeding (risk ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.75, 1.26]; p = 0.83; I-2 = 0%), or mortality (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.82, 1.04]; p = 0.20; I-2 = 31%). Conclusions: Trial evidence to date suggests that any type of heparin thromboprophylaxis decreases deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in medical-surgical critically ill patients, and low-molecular-weight heparin compared with bid unfractionated heparin decreases pulmonary embolism and symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Major bleeding and mortality rates do not appear to be significantly influenced by heparin thromboprophylaxis in the ICU setting. Trial methodology, indirectness, and the heterogeneity and imprecision of some results temper inferences from this literature.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice GuidelinesSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Dalteparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in Critically Ill PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in critically ill patients undergoing major surgeryBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 2010
- Low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical critically ill patients: A systematic reviewJournal of Critical Care, 2009
- Effectiveness of thigh-length graduated compression stockings to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis after stroke (CLOTS trial 1): a multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Venous thromboembolism in critically ill patientsThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Are All Low Molecular Weight Heparins Equivalent in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism?Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/hemostasis, 2007
- The contrast between venographic and clinical endpoints in trials of thromboprophylaxis in hip replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2000