The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 51 (2), 127-132
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e318279486b
Abstract
Context: Misperceptions are a major problem in debates about health care reform and other controversial health issues. Methods: We conducted an experiment to determine if more aggressive media fact-checking could correct the false belief that the Affordable Care Act would create “death panels.” Participants from an opt-in Internet panel were randomly assigned to either a control group in which they read an article on Sarah Palin’s claims about “death panels” or an intervention group in which the article also contained corrective information refuting Palin. Findings: The correction reduced belief in death panels and strong opposition to the reform bill among those who view Palin unfavorably and those who view her favorably but have low political knowledge. However, it backfired among politically knowledgeable Palin supporters, who were more likely to believe in death panels and to strongly oppose reform if they received the correction. Conclusions: These results underscore the difficulty of reducing misperceptions about health care reform among individuals with the motivation and sophistication to reject corrective information.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Images of Illness: How Causal Claims and Racial Associations Influence Public Preferences toward Diabetes Research SpendingJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2010
- Parental Vaccine Safety Concerns in 2009PEDIATRICS, 2010
- When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political MisperceptionsPolitical Behavior, 2010
- Fear, misinformation, and innumerates: How the Wakefield paper, the press, and advocacy groups damaged the public healthVaccine, 2010
- Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political BeliefsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2006
- Biased Assimilation, Attitude Polarization, and Affect in Reactions to Stereotype-Relevant Scientific InformationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997
- The Lyme Disease ControversyArchives of Internal Medicine, 1996
- A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979