Naïve predators and selection for rare conspicuous defended prey: the initial evolution of aposematism revisited
- 31 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Animal Behaviour
- Vol. 75 (3), 771-781
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONDITIONS FOR THE SPREAD OF CONSPICUOUS WARNING SIGNALS: A NUMERICAL MODEL WITH NOVEL INSIGHTSEvolution, 2006
- Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defenceJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2006
- Avian predators taste–reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defenceBiology Letters, 2006
- Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic preyBiology Letters, 2005
- Dietary conservatism may facilitate the initial evolution of aposematismOikos, 2003
- Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversiveProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2001
- Chemical defence in ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae). II. Amount of reflex fluid, the alkaloid adaline and individual variation in defence in 2-spot ladybirds (Adalia bipunctata)Chemoecology, 1991
- The Cost of Being Aposematic. An Experimental Study of Predation on Larvae of Papilio Machaon by the Great Tit Parus MajorOikos, 1981
- Innate Recognition of Coral Snake Pattern by a Possible Avian PredatorScience, 1975
- Perceptual changes in chicks: Another look at the ‘search image’ conceptAnimal Behaviour, 1971