Topping-off technique for stabilization of lumbar degenerative instabilities in 322 patients
- 1 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
- Vol. 32 (3), 366-372
- https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.8.SPINE181434
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Semi-rigid instrumentation (SRI) was introduced to take advantage of the concept of load sharing in surgery for spinal stabilization. The authors investigated a topping-off technique in which interbody fusion is not performed in the uppermost motion segment, thus creating a smooth transition from stabilized to free motion segments. SRI using the topping-off technique also reduces the motion of the adjacent segments, which may reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), a frequently observed sequela of instrumentation and fusion, but this technique may also increase the possibility of screw loosening (SL). In the present study the authors aimed to systematically evaluate reoperation rates, clinical outcomes, and potential risk factors and incidences of ASD and SL for this novel approach. METHODS The authors collected data for the first 322 patients enrolled at their institution from 2009 to 2015 who underwent surgery performed using the topping-off technique. Reoperation rates, patient satisfaction, and other outcome measures were evaluated. All patients underwent pedicle screw-based semi-rigid stabilization of the lumbar spine with a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rod system. RESULTS Implantation of PEEK rods during revision surgery was performed in 59.9% of patients. A median of 3 motion segments (range 1-5 segments) were included and a median of 2 motion segments (range 0-4 segments) were fused. A total of 89.4% of patients underwent fusion, 73.3% by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), 18.4% by anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), 3.1% by extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), 0.3% by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), and 4.9% by combined approaches in the same surgery. Combined radicular and lumbar pain according to a visual analog scale was reduced from 7.9 +/- 1.0 to 4.0 +/- 3.1, with 56.2% of patients indicating benefit from surgery. After maximum follow-up (4.3 +/- 1.8 years), the reoperation rate was 16.4%. CONCLUSIONS The PEEK rod concept including the topping-off principle seems safe, with at least average patient satisfaction in this patient group. Considering the low rate of first-tier surgeries, the presented results seem at least comparable to those of most other series. Follow-up studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes, particularly with respect to ASD, which might be reduced by the presented approach.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventionsThe Spine Journal, 2013
- Risk for Adjacent Segment and Same Segment Reoperation After Surgery for Lumbar StenosisSpine, 2013
- Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysisThe Spine Journal, 2013
- Biomechanical Assessment of a PEEK Rod System for Semi-Rigid Fixation of Lumbar Fusion ConstructsJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2011
- Nonfusion stabilization of the degenerative lumbar spineJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2011
- Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: Part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motionEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: Part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-upEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Adjacent Segment Mobility After Rigid and Semirigid Instrumentation of the Lumbar SpineSpine, 2009
- Adjacent Segment Disease FollowingLumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion With Pedicle Screw InstrumentationSpine, 2007
- Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine and Its Effects on Adjacent SegmentsJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2003