Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing
- 31 December 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Nursing Outlook
- Vol. 60 (6), 391-400
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research citation analysis of nursing academics in Canada: identifying success indicatorsJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2010
- Scientific Impact ConsideredWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 2010
- Comparison of journal title coverage between CINAHL and ScopusJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2009
- The state of h index researchEMBO Reports, 2008
- The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Google ScholarOnline Information Review, 2008
- Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysisEthics in Science and Environmental Politics, 2008
- Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google ScholarScientometrics, 2007
- Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknessesThe FASEB Journal, 2007
- Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of ScienceBiomedical Digital Libraries, 2006
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005