No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
- Vol. 4 (2), 241-261
- https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0001-7
Abstract
No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter A bone of contention among researchers is whether the primary function of humour is the expression of aggression against the hearer or the promotion of solidarity between the interlocutors. It is commonly averred that teasing boasts a dichotomous nature, i.e. malignant and benevolent. The former coincides with the potential for criticising, mocking and ostracising the interlocutor, whereas the latter accounts for playfulness and bonding capacity. The overriding goal of the paper is to expound the rapport-building function, which is here postulated to be inherent to teasing. First and foremost, I will determine the scope of interest differentiating between putdown humour and teases , which may assume the form of retorts and develop into multi-turn teases, i.e. banter. Subtypes of teasing will be discussed with a view to proving that it is inherently devoid of genuine aggressiveness. The underlying premise is that teases, even if ostensibly aggressive, i.e. face-threatening, are geared towards solidarity, in conformity with the framework of politeness, including mock impoliteness , holding between intimates. Also, teases fulfil a few subordinate functions such as defunctionalisation or mitigation of face-threatening messages they may carry.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplaceJournal of Pragmatics, 2006
- Annual IndexHuman Relations, 2002
- “I was Only Kidding!”: Victims’ and Perpetrators’ Perceptions of TeasingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000
- TEASING, DISPUTING, AND PLAYINGGender & Society, 1997
- Social Construction of TeasingJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1989
- Wit and humor in discourse processingDiscourse Processes, 1988
- Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/InterviewSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1987
- Stock conversational witticismsJournal of Pragmatics, 1984
- Who's got the floor?Language in Society, 1981
- Does Ethnic Humor Serve Prejudice?Journal of Communication, 1976