The Cross Section of Analyst Recommendations
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
- Vol. 41 (1), 139-168
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109000002453
Abstract
We analyze the price reaction to analysts' revisions by testing the Griffin and Tversky (1992) hypothesis that agents place emphasis on the strength of the signal (the dramatic nature of the event) and may de-emphasize the weight (the ability of the analyst making the recommendation). Two attributes, namely, years of experience and the reputation of the analysts' brokerage houses form proxies for analyst ability (or weight) that we validate by documenting that revisions by high ability analysts outperform those by low ability ones. We find evidence of return persistence following small (low strength) revisions by high ability analysts and the opposite return pattern following large (high strength) revisions of low ability analysts, consistent with the arguments of Griffin and Tversky (1992). Our study provides an empirical link between evidence on individual decision making and stock market returns, and also helps promote an understanding of the analyst industry as well as its interaction with the investing population.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- The Limits of ArbitrageThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing AnomaliesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?The Journal of Finance, 1996
- An Analysis of the Recommendations of the "Superstar" Money Managers at Barron's Annual RoundtableThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter ReputationThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- An Analysis of Brokers' and Analysts' Unpublished Forecasts of UK Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1984