Assessment of functioning in patients with head and neck cancer according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): A multicenter study
- 8 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 119 (5), 915-923
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20211
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the level of functioning in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) using the the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Methods: Multicenter study at nine different study centers in four European countries. Data collection included structured interviews according to the extended ICF checklist with 145 HNC patients and completion of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ‐ Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC‐QLQ). The generic ICF checklist was extended by additional HNC‐specific categories identified in six HNC‐specific questionnaires: EORTC, University of Washington Quality of Life (UW‐QOL), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT), Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck cancer patients (PSS‐HN), Head and Neck Quality of Life instrument (HN‐QOL), and Voice Handicap Index (VHI). The ICF qualifier system was applied on a scale from 0 (not impaired) to 4 (completely impaired), as well as “ns, na” (not specified, not applicable) and “c” (impaired due to comorbidity). ICF categories impaired due to HNC (1–4) in ≥10% of patients were reported. Results: One hundred fifteen (80%) of 144 categories of the extended ICF checklist were identified to be at least mildly impaired or restricted in ≥10% of patients. The four areas that were relevant to most of the patients were “immediate family” (91%), “friends” (86%), “health services and policies” (85%) and “health professionals” (85%), all belonging to the ICF component of environmental factors. The most often identified categories were “ingestion” (75%) for body functions and “speaking” (76%) for activities and participation. The summary score of all answers correlated well with the overall level of health and quality of life as assessed in the EORTC questionnaires (0.59, 0.61, respectively). Conclusions: The ICF identifies problems in functioning in patients with HNC comprehensively. The results emphasize the importance of contextual environmental factors. In particular, environmental factors referring to interpersonal support should be more strongly included in rehabilitation plans for HNC. Laryngoscope, 2009Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V.
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of Life Correlates After Surgery for Laryngeal CarcinomaThe Laryngoscope, 2007
- Quality of life and functional status in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: pretreatment values of a prospective studyPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2007
- Patients’ perceived health status following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancerInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2006
- Quality of Life after Treatment for Laryngeal CarcinomasORL, 2006
- Long-term quality of life after total laryngectomyHead & Neck, 2006
- ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learnedJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2005
- Speech Intelligibility and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer SurvivorsThe Laryngoscope, 2004
- Identification of the most common patient problems in patients with chronic conditions using the ICF checklistJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2004
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.BMJ, 1990