Interhospital variability in satisfaction with withdrawal of life support: Room for improvement?
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (2), 626-631
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000051514.68705.b9
Abstract
To develop instruments to measure the current level of satisfaction with the withdrawal of life support among nurses and respiratory therapists and to use these instruments to determine whether differences in satisfaction levels with the withdrawal of life support could be found among different institutions. A multicenter, self-administered, questionnaire-based study. The intensive care units of three academic and 11 community hospitals. A total of 412 critical care nurses and 117 respiratory therapists working in these intensive care units. None. After developing two similar questionnaires for critical care nurses and respiratory therapists, we assessed the reliability of the individual items for each questionnaire and only used those found to be reliable in the analyses. We found variability in the satisfaction level of critical care nurses among different intensive care units and among academic and community hospital intensive care units. Being involved in the plan for withdrawal of life support, comfort with the way discussions with the family had gone, comfort with patient sedation, and increasing experience with withdrawal of life support were items associated with increased nurse satisfaction. For respiratory therapists, there seemed to be similar differences among institutions in satisfaction level, although numbers were limited. Having the physician explain the plan to them and becoming more comfortable with withdrawal of life support as a result of increased experience were found to be associated with increased satisfaction levels for respiratory therapists. Satisfaction levels of intensive care unit nurses and respiratory therapists with the process of withdrawing life support vary among institutions. This variation may represent an opportunity for improvement in the process of withdrawing life support within this region.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Critical Care Research Network: a partnership in community‐based research and research transferJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2000
- Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: A comparison of teaching and community hospitalsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Confidence in life-support decisions in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Letting go: Family willingness to forgo life supportHeart & Lung, 1996
- The Role of Critical Care Nurses in Euthanasia and Assisted SuicideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unitCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Determinants in Canadian Health Care Workers of the Decision to Withdraw Life Support From the Critically IllJAMA, 1995
- Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospitalCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill TASK FORCE ON ETHICS OF THE SOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINECritical Care Medicine, 1990
- Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support from the Critically IllNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990