Assessing smoking status in children, adolescents and adults: cotinine cut‐points revisited
- 7 August 2008
- Vol. 103 (9), 1553-1561
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02297.x
Abstract
Aims To reassess saliva cotinine cut‐points to discriminate smoking status. Cotinine cut‐points that are in use were derived from relatively small samples of smokers and non‐smokers 20 or more years ago. It is possible that optimal cut‐points may have changed as prevalence and exposure to passive smoking have declined. Design Cross‐sectional survey of the general population, with assessment of self‐reported smoking and saliva cotinine. Participants A total of 58 791 respondents aged 4 years and older in the Health Survey for England for the years 1996–2004 who provided valid saliva cotinine specimens. Measures Saliva cotinine concentrations, demographic variables, self‐reported smoking, presence or absence of smoking in the home, a composite index of social disadvantage derived from occupation, housing tenure and access to a car. Findings A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml performed best overall, with specificity of 96.9% and sensitivity of 96.7% in discriminating confirmed cigarette smokers from never regular smokers. This cut‐point also identified correctly 95.8% of children aged 8–15 years smoking six or more cigarettes a week. There was evidence of substantial misreport in claimed ex‐smokers, especially adolescents (specificity 72.3%) and young adults aged 16–24 years (77.5%). Optimal cut‐points varied by presence (18 ng/ml) or absence (5 ng/ml) of smoking in the home, and there was a gradient from 8 ng/ml to 18 ng/ml with increasing social disadvantage. Conclusions The extent of non‐smokers' exposure to other people's tobacco smoke is the principal factor driving optimal cotinine cut‐points. A cut‐point of 12 ng/ml can be recommended for general use across the whole age range, although different cut‐points may be appropriate for population subgroups and in societies with differing levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can We Trust National Smoking Prevalence Figures? Discrepancies Between Biochemically Assessed and Self-Reported Smoking Rates in Three CountriesCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2007
- Measuring nicotine intake in population surveys: Comparability of saliva cotinine and plasma cotinine estimatesNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2003
- Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessationNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2002
- Children's exposure to passive smoking in England since the 1980s: cotinine evidence from population surveysBMJ, 2000
- A rapid gas-liquid chromatographic method for the determination of cotinine and nicotine in biological fluidsJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1990
- Application of biochemical intake markers to passive smoking measurement and risk estimationMutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, 1989
- Optimum cutoff points for biochemical validation of smoking status.American Journal of Public Health, 1988
- Saliva Cotinine as an Indicator of Cigarette Smoking in AdolescentsBritish Journal of Addiction, 1987
- Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- An evaluation of the intervention against smoking in the multiple risk factor intervention trialPreventive Medicine, 1984