A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal
- 14 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Urology and Nephrology
- Vol. 49 (5), 753-761
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1538-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Stent Placement Necessary After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy for Removal of Impacted Ureteral Stones?Journal of Endourology, 2010
- Stenting versus non‐stenting after non‐complicated ureteroscopic manipulation of stones in bilharzial uretersInternational Journal of Urology, 2006
- Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?Kidney International, 2005
- Stent Positioning after Ureteroscopy for Urinary Calculi: The Question Is Still OpenEuropean Urology, 2004
- Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complicationsBJU International, 2004
- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Ureteral Stenting after Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 2003
- Indwelling Ureteral Stents: Evaluation of Symptoms, Quality of Life and UtilityJournal of Urology, 2003
- Is Ureteral Stenting Necessary After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy? A Prospective, Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Urology, 2002
- ROUTINE URETERAL STENTING AFTER URETEROSCOPY FOR URETERAL LITHIASIS: IS IT REALLY NECESSARY?Journal of Urology, 2001
- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING NONSTENTED VERSUS STENTED URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSYJournal of Urology, 2001