Design of Phase II Cancer Trials Using a Continuous Endpoint of Change in Tumor Size: Application to a Study of Sorafenib and Erlotinib in Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open Access
- 25 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 99 (19), 1455-1461
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm158
Abstract
Background The primary objective of phase II cancer clinical trials is to determine whether a new regimen has sufficient activity to warrant further study, with activity generally defined as tumor shrinkage. However, oncology drug development has been limited by high rates of failure (lack of efficacy) in subsequent phase III testing. This high failure rate may reflect the process by which antineoplastic agents are usually evaluated in phase II trials, i.e., via single-arm studies in which the primary efficacy measure is the proportion of patients who achieve a complete or partial response to the treatment. This design may efficiently eliminate truly ineffective therapy but may not reliably indicate whether subsequent phase III testing is warranted. Methods We describe the design of a randomized phase II clinical trial of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for the treatment of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer using change in tumor size, measured on a continuous scale, as the primary outcome variable. For the purpose of determining the sample size of the trial, we made assumptions as to the likely magnitude of treatment effect and the variability in tumor size changes based on data from four previous trials using these agents. Results The study design includes two different dosage arms and a placebo group with a total sample size of 150 patients and is powered to detect a modest reduction in the mean tumor size burden in the high-dose sorafenib arm compared with a slight increase in the placebo group. Conclusions Clinical trial designs that treat change in tumor size as a continuous variable rather than categorizing the changes are feasible, and by inclusion of a prospective control group they offer advantages over conventional single-arm trials.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sorafenib in Advanced Clear-Cell Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Strategies for optimizing combinations of molecularly targeted anticancer agentsNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2006
- Phase II Placebo-Controlled Randomized Discontinuation Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Phase II Oncology Trials: Let's Be PositiveClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Phase II Studies of Modern Drugs Directed Against New Targets: If You Are Fazed, Too, Then Resist RECISTJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2004
- New designs for phase 2 clinical trialsBlood, 2003
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989