A Comparison of Phenytoin-loading Techniques in the Emergency Department
Open Access
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 11 (3), 244-252
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb02204.x
Abstract
To compare the effectivenesses of three phenytoin-loading techniques. Patients with subtherapeutic phenytoin concentrations who presented within 48 hours of a seizure were randomized to receive either 20 mg/kg of oral phenytoin (PO), divided in maximum doses of 400 mg every two hours, 18 mg/kg of intravenous phenytoin (IVP) at an initial infusion rate of 50 mg/min, or 18 mg/kg (phenytoin equivalents) of intravenous fosphenytoin (IVF) at an initial infusion rate of 150 mg/min. A total of 45 patients were enrolled: 16 in the PO group, 14 in the IVP group, and 15 in the IVF group. The times required to reach therapeutic drug concentrations were (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) 5.62 +/- 0.28 hours, 0.24 +/- 0.3 hours, and 0.21 +/- 0.28 hours, respectively. A total of 17, 27, and 32 adverse drug events were observed in the PO, IVP, and IVF groups, respectively, with significantly fewer events in the PO group (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). No significant difference was found between the numbers of necessary adjustments to the infusions in the two IV groups. The average time to safe emergency department discharge was significantly shorter for the IV groups compared with the PO group (p < 0.001). Oral loading has fewer adverse drug events than either IV loading method, but its use may be limited when therapeutic concentrations are required quickly. Although IVF loading is faster, from an adverse-drug event perspective, no advantage of IVF over IVP was apparent.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Arrest After Fast Intravenous Infusion of Phenytoin Mistaken for FosphenytoinEpilepsia, 2001
- Fosphenytoin and Phenytoin in Patients with Status EpilepticusDrug Safety, 2000
- A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of intravenous fosphenytoin (Cerebyx®) versus intravenous phenytoin (Dilantin®) in hospital emergency departmentsClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- Acute Oral Loading of Carbamazepine‐CR and Phenytoin in a Double‐Blind Randomized Study of Patients at Risk of SeizuresEpilepsia, 1994
- Phenytoin administration by constant intravenous infusion: Selective rates of administrationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1991
- Safety, Tolerance and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Doses of the Phosphate Ester of 3‐Hydroxymethyl‐5,5‐Diphenylhydantoin: A New Prodrug of PhenytoinThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1988
- Single-dose oral phenytoin loadingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1987
- Sudden death following intravenous sodium diphenylhydantoinAmerican Heart Journal, 1976
- Pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of phenytoin in manEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1974
- Ventricular standstill after intravenous diphenylhydantoinAmerican Heart Journal, 1967