Social Foundations of Health Care Inequality and Treatment Bias
- 30 July 2016
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Sociology
- Vol. 42 (1), 101-120
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074226
Abstract
It is widely assumed that the use of medical care will lead to improvements in health, yet questions remain about the medical system's contributions to health disparities. In this review, we examine these issues with a specific focus on how health care systems may actually generate or exacerbate health disparities. We review current knowledge about inequality and bias in the health care system, including the epidemiology of such patterns and their underlying mechanisms. Over the past three decades, we observe growth in our knowledge about provider cognitive and psychological processing, including the development of precision measuring tools to analyze provider bias, racial and otherwise. In the same timeframe we observe decreased emphasis on social, interactional, organizational, and structural factors that shape variation in medical treatment. We frame our discussion within a modified social ecological model and discuss tools for moving forward and reinvigorating sociological presence in this important research area.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences Between Internists and Family Practitioners in the Diagnosis and Management of the Same Patient With Coronary Heart DiseaseMedical Care Research and Review, 2011
- Geographic Variation in Diagnosis Frequency and Risk of Death Among Medicare BeneficiariesJAMA, 2011
- Regional Variations in Diagnostic PracticesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Aversive racism and medical interactions with Black patients: A field studyJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010
- Physicians’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes About Race by MD Race, Ethnicity, and GenderJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2009
- Does the culture of a medical practice affect the clinical management of diabetes by primary care providers?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2009
- Is certainty more important than diagnosis for understanding race and gender disparities?: An experiment using coronary heart disease and depression case vignettesHealth Policy, 2009
- Patient–provider race-concordance: does it matter in improving minority patients’ health outcomes?Ethnicity & Health, 2009
- How are patient characteristics relevant for physicians' clinical decision making in diabetes? An analysis of qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experimentSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White PatientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007