Universal prevention of depression in women postnatally: cluster randomized trial evidence in primary care
Open Access
- 18 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychological Medicine
- Vol. 41 (4), 739-748
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291710001467
Abstract
To test whether receiving care from a health visitor (HV) trained in identification and psychological intervention methods prevents depression 6–18 months postnatally in women who are not depressed 6 weeks postnatally. The study was a prospective cluster trial, randomized by GP practice, with follow-up for 18 months in 101 primary care teams in the Trent area of England. The participants were women scoring <12 on the postal Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 6 weeks postnatally (1474 intervention and 767 control women). Intervention HVs (n=89, 63 clusters) were trained in identifying depressive symptoms using the EPDS and face-to-face clinical assessment and in providing psychologically orientated sessions based on cognitive behavioral or person-centered principles. The control group comprised HVs (n=49, 37 clusters) providing care as usual (CAU). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women scoring ⩾12 on the EPDS at 6 months postnatally. Secondary outcomes were mean EPDS score, Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) score, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF) scores at 6, 12 and 18 months. After adjusting for individual-level covariates, living alone, previous postnatal depression (PND), the presence of one or more adverse life events and the 6-week EPDS score, the odds ratio (OR) for EPDS ⩾12 at 6 months was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.97, p=0.031] for the intervention group (IG) women compared with the control (CAU) group women. Two subgroups were formed by baseline severity: a ‘subthreshold’ subgroup with a 6-week EPDS score of 6–11 (n=999) and a ‘lowest severity’ subgroup with a 6-week EPDS score of 0–5 (n=1242). There was no difference in psychological effectiveness by subgroup (interaction term: z=−0.28, p=0.782). This study provides new evidence of a universal, enduring preventive effect for depression in women who screen negative for depression postnatally.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of Depression in At-Risk AdolescentsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2009
- A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum and postpartum womenActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2009
- Trends in service use and treatment for mental disorders in adults throughout Great BritainThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- Subthreshold depression as a risk indicator for major depressive disorder: a systematic review of prospective studiesActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2004
- Controlled Clinical Trial of Interpersonal Psychotherapy Versus Parenting Education Program for Depressed Pregnant WomenAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001
- Impact of midwife-managed care in the postnatal period: An exploration of psychosocial outcomesJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1997
- Rates and risk of postpartum depression—a meta-analysisInternational Review of Psychiatry, 1996
- Social support and psychiatric disorder: recommendations for clinical practice and researchPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995
- Detection of Postnatal DepressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987