Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations
- 31 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 72 (4), 447-456
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976765
Abstract
This article uses a public management controversy in California to show how planners who work with contentious publics can learn from skillful mediators. Citizen participation often produces more heat than light, since conflict often yields little new understanding or dialogue, and even less negotiated agreement on public action. Yet skillful mediation may move beyond either dialogue or debate to craft mutually beneficial public agreements among contentious stakeholders. Mediated participation techniques can redirect conflict into joint inquiry, explore options rather than escalate demands, and achieve practical ends that will serve diverse interests.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deliberation before the RevolutionPolitical Theory, 2005
- Consensus Building: Clarifications for the CriticsPlanning Theory, 2004
- Reframing practicePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2003
- Walking in Another’s ShoesJournal of Planning Education and Research, 2001
- Consensus Building as Role Playing and BricolageJournal of the American Planning Association, 1999
- Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark SideJournal of Planning Literature, 1998
- Participating the Public: Group Process, Politics, and PlanningJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1997
- Why the Rational Paradigm Persists: Tales from the FieldJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1996
- Planning In the Face of Conflict: Negotiation and Mediation Strategies in local Land Use RegulationJournal of the American Planning Association, 1987
- A Ladder Of Citizen ParticipationJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969