Are all interventions created equal? A multi-threat approach to tailoring stereotype threat interventions.
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Vol. 104 (2), 277-288
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030461
Abstract
To date, stereotype threat interventions have been considered interchangeable. Across 4 experiments, the present research demonstrates that stereotype threat interventions need to be tailored to the specific form of experienced stereotype threat to be effective. The Multi-Threat Framework (Shapiro & Neuberg, 2007) distinguishes between group-as-target stereotype threats-concerns that a stereotype-relevant performance will reflect poorly on the abilities of one's group-and self-as-target stereotype threats-concerns that a stereotype-relevant performance will reflect poorly on one's own abilities. The present experiments explored Black college students' performance on diagnostic intelligence tests (Experiments 1 and 3) and women's interest (Experiment 2) and performance (Experiment 4) in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Across the 4 experiments, participants were randomly assigned to experience either a group-as-target or self-as-target stereotype threat. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that role model interventions were successful at protecting only against group-as-target stereotype threats, and Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that self-affirmation interventions were successful at protecting only against self-as-target stereotype threats. The present research provides an experimental test of the Multi-Threat Framework across different negatively stereotyped groups (Black students, female students), different negatively stereotyped domains (general intelligence, STEM), and different outcomes (test performance, career interest). This research suggests that interventions should address the range of possible stereotype threats to effectively protect individuals against these threats. Through an appreciation of the distinct forms of stereotype threats and the ways in which interventions work to reduce them, this research aims to facilitate a more complete understanding of stereotype threat.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (BCS0956321)
- National Institutes of Health (RC1GM09071, R01GM102701)
- University of California, Los Angeles
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Different Groups, Different Threats: A Multi-Threat Approach to the Experience of Stereotype ThreatsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2011
- STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011
- Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in College Science: A Classroom Study of Values AffirmationScience, 2010
- Affirmed yet unaware: Exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009
- Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement GapScience, 2009
- Clearing the air: The effect of experimenter race on target's test performance and subjective experienceBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2005
- We Can Do It: The Interplay of Construal Orientation and Social Comparisons Under Threat.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975