Comparing Continuous and Intermittent Exercise: An “Isoeffort” and “Isotime” Approach
Open Access
- 15 April 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (4), e94990
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094990
Abstract
The present study proposes an alternative way of comparing performance and acute physiological responses to continuous exercise with those of intermittent exercise, ensuring similar between-protocol overall effort (isoeffort) and the same total duration of exercise (isotime). This approach was expected to overcome some drawbacks of traditional methods of comparison. Fourteen competitive cyclists (20±3 yrs) performed a preliminary incremental test and four experimental 30-min self-paced protocols, i.e. one continuous and three passive-recovery intermittent exercise protocols with different work-to-rest ratios (2 = 40∶20s, 1 = 30∶30s and 0.5 = 20∶40s). A “maximal session effort” prescription was adopted for this experimental design. As expected, a robust perceived exertion template was observed irrespective of exercise protocol. Similar between-protocol pacing strategies further support the use of the proposed approach in competitive cyclists. Total work, oxygen uptake and heart rate mean values were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the continuous compared to intermittent protocols, while lactate values were lower. Manipulating the work-to-rest ratio in intermittent exercise, total work, oxygen uptake and heart rate mean values decreased with the decrease in the work-to-rest ratio, while lactate values increased. Despite this complex physiological picture, all protocols showed similar ventilatory responses and a nearly perfect relationship between respiratory frequency and perceived exertion. In conclusion, our data indicate that overall effort and total duration of exercise are two critical parameters that should both be controlled when comparing continuous with intermittent exercise. On an isoeffort and isotime basis, the work-to-rest ratio manipulation affects physiological responses in a different way from what has been reported in literature with traditional methods of comparison. Finally, our data suggest that during intermittent exercise respiratory frequency reflects physiological strain better than oxygen uptake, heart rate and blood lactate.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement Accuracy of Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate during Graded Exercise and Sustained Exercise in the Heat Using the Zephyr BioHarnessTMInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012
- Physiological adaptations to low‐volume, high‐intensity interval training in health and diseaseJournal Of Physiology-London, 2012
- Locomotor muscle fatigue increases cardiorespiratory responses and reduces performance during intense cycling exercise independently from metabolic stressAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2008
- Physiological Responses to Interval Training Sessions at Velocities Associated With &Vdot;o2maxJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2007
- Physiological Determinants of Time to Exhaustion during Intermittent Treadmill Running at vV·O2maxInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006
- Relationship between ventilatory response and body temperature during prolonged submaximal exerciseJournal of Applied Physiology, 2006
- The Scientific Basis for High-Intensity Interval TrainingSports Medicine, 2002
- The Influence of Sensory Cues on the Perception of Exertion During Exercise and Central Regulation of Exercise PerformanceSports Medicine, 2001
- Physiological Correlates of Perceived Exertion in Continuous and Intermittent Exercise with the Same Average Power OutputEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1972
- Intermittent Muscular WorkActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1960