The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A Review with a Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Item Content and Factor Structure
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (3), e58067
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058067
Abstract
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) is a commonly used freely available self-report measure of depressive symptoms. Despite its popularity, several recent investigations have called into question the robustness and suitability of the commonly used 4-factor 20-item CES-D model. The goal of the current study was to address these concerns by confirming the factorial validity of the CES-D. Differential item functioning estimates were used to examine sex biases in item responses, and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess prior CES-D factor structures and new models heeding current theoretical and empirical considerations. Data used for the analyses included undergraduate (n = 948; 74% women), community (n = 254; 71% women), rehabilitation (n = 522; 53% women), clinical (n = 84; 77% women), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; n = 2814; 56% women) samples. Differential item functioning identified an item as inflating CES-D scores in women. Comprehensive comparison of the several models supported a novel, psychometrically robust, and unbiased 3-factor 14-item solution, with factors (i.e., negative affect, anhedonia, and somatic symptoms) that are more in line with current diagnostic criteria for depression. Researchers and practitioners may benefit from using the novel factor structure of the CES-D and from being cautious in interpreting results from the originally proposed scale. Comprehensive results, implications, and future research directions are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression scale (CES-D) item response bias found with Mantel-Haenszel method was successfully replicated using latent variable modelingJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Meta-analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and ZungJournal of Clinical Psychology, 2005
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- PSYCHOMETRICS FOR TWO SHORT FORMS OF THE CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES-DEPRESSION SCALEIssues in Mental Health Nursing, 1998
- The Effect of Gender and Race on the Measurement Properties of the CES-D in Older AdultsMedical Care, 1994
- Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1991
- Development of a Brief Screening Instrument for Detecting Depressive DisordersMedical Care, 1988
- Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1988
- Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1988
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977