Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Current Knowledge
Top Cited Papers
- 18 July 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 94 (14), e104
- https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.k.01417
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection continues to frustrate the medical community. Although the demand for total joint arthroplasty is increasing, the burden of such infections is increasing even more rapidly, and they pose a unique challenge because their accurate diagnosis and eradication can prove elusive. This review describes the current knowledge regarding diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. A number of tools are available to aid in establishing a diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. These include the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein concentration, synovial white blood-cell count and differential, imaging studies, tissue specimen culturing, and histological analysis. Multiple definitions of periprosthetic joint infection have been proposed but there is no consensus. Tools under investigation to diagnose such infections include the C-reactive protein concentration in the joint fluid, point-of-care strip tests for the leukocyte esterase concentration in the joint fluid, and other molecular markers of periprosthetic joint infection. Treatment options include irrigation and debridement with prosthesis retention, one-stage prosthesis exchange, two-stage prosthesis exchange with intervening placement of an antibiotic-loaded spacer, and salvage treatments such as joint arthrodesis and amputation. Treatment selection is dependent on multiple factors including the timing of the symptom onset, patient health, the infecting organism, and a history of infection in the joint. Although prosthesis retention has the theoretical advantages of decreased morbidity and improved return to function, two-stage exchange provides a lower rate of recurrent infection. As the burden of periprosthetic joint infection increases, the orthopaedic and medical community should become more familiar with the disease. It is hoped that the tools currently under investigation will aid clinicians in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in an accurate and timely fashion to allow appropriate treatment. Given the current knowledge and planned future research, the medical community should be prepared to effectively manage this increasingly prevalent disease.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mark B. Coventry Award: Synovial C-reactive Protein: A Prospective Evaluation of a Molecular Marker for Periprosthetic Knee Joint InfectionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of FailureClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Definition of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Is There a Consensus?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Infection Control Rate of Irrigation and Débridement for Periprosthetic Joint InfectionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection SocietyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- The Mark Coventry Award: Diagnosis of Early Postoperative TKA Infection Using Synovial Fluid AnalysisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for Periprosthetic InfectionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Outcome of a Second Two-stage Reimplantation for Periprosthetic Knee InfectionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Periprosthetic Infection Due to Resistant Staphylococci: Serious Problems on the HorizonClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- FDG-PET Imaging Can Diagnose Periprosthetic Infection of the HipClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008