Problematising accounting for biodiversity
- 14 June 2013
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Vol. 26 (5), 668-687
- https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2013-1255
Abstract
Purpose: This paper seeks to problematise “accounting for biodiversity” and to provide a framework for analysing and understanding the role of accounting in preserving and enhancing biodiversity on Planet Earth. The paper aims to raise awareness of the urgent need to address biodiversity loss and extinction and the need for corporations to discharge accountability for their part in the current biodiversity crisis by accounting for their biodiversity‐related strategies and policies. Such accounting is, it is believed, emancipatory and leads to engendering change in corporate behaviour and attitudes.Design/methodology/approach: The authors reviewed the literature relating to biodiversity across a wide array of disciplines including anthropology, biodiversity, ecology, finance, philosophy, and of course, accounting, in order to build an image of the current state of biodiversity and the role which accounting can and “should” play in the future of biodiversity.Findings: It is found that the problems underlying accounting for biodiversity fall into four broad categories: philosophical and scientific problems, accountability problems, technical accounting problems, and problems of accounting practice.Practical implications: Through establishing a framework problematising biodiversity, a roadmap is laid out for researchers and practitioners to navigate a route for future research and policymaking in biodiversity accounting. It is concluded that an interdisciplinary approach to accounting for biodiversity is crucial to ensuring effective action on biodiversity and for accounting for biodiversity to achieve its emancipatory potential.Originality/value: Although there is a wealth of sustainability reporting research, there is hardly any work exploring the role of accounting in preserving and enhancing biodiversity. There is no research exploring the current state of accounting for biodiversity. This paper summarises the current state of biodiversity using an interdisciplinary approach and introduces a series of papers devoted to the role of accounting in biodiversity accepted for this AAAJ special issue. The paper also provides a framework identifying the diverse problems associated with accounting for biodiversity.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regimeAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2013
- Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: corporate disclosure and preparers' viewsAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2013
- Mapping the biosphere: exploring species to understand the origin, organization and sustainability of biodiversitySystematics and Biodiversity, 2012
- Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reportingAccounting Forum, 2010
- Satanic Mills?: An illustration of Victorian external environmental accountingAccounting Forum, 2009
- Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing linkAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2007
- From sustainable management to sustainable development: a longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporterBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 2006
- Organic salmon farming: risk perceptions, decision heuristics and the absence of environmental accountingAccounting Forum, 2005
- The Discourse of the Middle GroundManagement Communication Quarterly, 2002
- ACCOUNTING FOR BIODIVERSITY: A PILOT STUDYThe British Accounting Review, 1996