Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial
- 19 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 377 (9762), 301-311
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62103-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional Variation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Incidence and OutcomeJAMA, 2008
- Impact of impedance threshold devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studiesCritical Care Medicine, 2008
- Intrathoracic pressure regulation for intracranial pressure management in normovolemic and hypovolemic pigsCritical Care Medicine, 2006
- Part 1: IntroductionCirculation, 2005
- Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrestResuscitation, 2005
- Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression–decompression techniquesResuscitation, 2005
- Evaluation of an impedance threshold device in patients receiving active compression–decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out of hospital cardiac arrestResuscitation, 2004
- Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus the Combination of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and an Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCirculation, 2003
- Inspiratory impedance threshold valve during CPRResuscitation, 2002
- Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The utstein styleAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1991