A Model of Fair Process and Its Limits
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
- Vol. 10 (4), 637-653
- https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0189
Abstract
Fair process research has shown that people care not only about outcomes, but also about the process that produces these outcomes. For a decision process to be seen as fair, the people affected must have the opportunity to give input and possibly to influence the decision, and the decision process and rationale must be transparent and clear. Existing research has shown empirically that fair process enhances both employee motivation and performance in execution. However, work to date has not addressed why fair process is so often violated in practice. This paper breaks new ground by analytically examining the subtle trade-offs involved. We develop a model of fair process in a principal-agent (i.e., manager-employee) context, rooted in psychological preferences for autonomy and fairness. We show that indeed fair process will not always be used, and why the hoped-for benefits may be insufficient to convince management to use fair process.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-AnalysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001
- Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of BehaviorPsychological Inquiry, 2000
- ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and CompetitionAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Informal authority in organizationsJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1999
- Formal and Real Authority in OrganizationsJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguityJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992
- Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part IIEthology and Sociobiology, 1989
- Darwin Sex StatusPublished by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,1989
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage AxiomsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1961