Poverty, tracking, and the social construction of failure: International perspectives on tracking
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Children and Poverty
- Vol. 9 (1), 3-20
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1079612022000052698
Abstract
Poverty in the United States, a report by the US Bureau of the Census, revealed that over 5 million US children under the age of 18 live in conditions of poverty. This statistic represents 20 percent of the total population of this age group and an increase of 2 million since the early 1970s. In the past, Americans have looked to education as a means of breaking the seemingly endless cycle of poverty. But rather than having experienced a facilitated transition to the middle class, less-advantaged children are twice as likely to be held back and often fail to complete their schooling (National Commission on Children, 1991). For over a half century, educational sociologists have struggled to explain the cause of this differential academic achievement, and more recently they have suggested that structures operating within the schools may facilitate success for some students and relegate others to academic failure. One such structure is tracking. Supporters of this practice emphasize its efficiency as well as its ability to enhance self-development. Critics emphasize the class and race bias in track placement, with less-advantaged children more often placed in lower tracks. This paper focuses on tracking and how it may perpetuate the cycle of poverty. It explores the impact of tracking on distribution of learning opportunity and career outcomes. An international perspective allows us to compare student outcomes from two countries that enjoy a considerable amount of social and cultural diversity, America and Great Britain, in the hope that cross-cultural analysis will clarify whether or not this organizational arrangement creates similar learning trajectories for all students or has particularly devastating consequences for the less advantaged. Clearly, the existing research has done little to resolve the debate and, now more than ever, a sense of urgency seems to color this issue in light of the overall perception that American education is failing.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Schooling, tracking, and inequalityJournal of Children and Poverty, 2001
- Raising Standards: Is ability grouping the answer?Oxford Review of Education, 1999
- Within-class grouping: evidence versus conjectureNational Institute Economic Review, 1999
- Assessment and Classroom LearningAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1998
- Comparing American and Japanese Achievement: Is the United States Really a Low Achiever?Educational Researcher, 1992
- The Effects of Stratification in Secondary Schools: Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic ResearchReview of Educational Research, 1987
- The Social Enhancement of Ability Differences: Teacher-Student Interactions in First-And Second-Grade Reading GroupsThe Elementary School Journal, 1986
- Classroom Intellectual Composition and Academic AchievementAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1986
- Ability Grouping and Student FriendshipsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1985
- The Stratification of Socialization ProcessesAmerican Sociological Review, 1975