A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 10 (1), 1-14
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
Abstract
Identifying, developing, and testing implementation strategies are important goals of implementation science. However, these efforts have been complicated by the use of inconsistent language and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies in the literature. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aimed to refine a published compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions by systematically gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders with expertise in implementation science and clinical practice. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a panel of experts in implementation and clinical practice who engaged in three rounds of a modified Delphi process to generate consensus on implementation strategies and definitions. The first and second rounds involved Web-based surveys soliciting comments on implementation strategy terms and definitions. After each round, iterative refinements were made based upon participant feedback. The third round involved a live polling and consensus process via a Web-based platform and conference call. Participants identified substantial concerns with 31% of the terms and/or definitions and suggested five additional strategies. Seventy-five percent of definitions from the originally published compilation of strategies were retained after voting. Ultimately, the expert panel reached consensus on a final compilation of 73 implementation strategies. This research advances the field by improving the conceptual clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness of implementation strategies that can be used in isolation or combination in implementation research and practice. Future phases of ERIC will focus on developing conceptually distinct categories of strategies as well as ratings for each strategy’s importance and feasibility. Next, the expert panel will recommend multifaceted strategies for hypothetical yet real-world scenarios that vary by sites’ endorsement of evidence-based programs and practices and the strength of contextual supports that surround the effort.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation researchImplementation Science, 2012
- Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: An exploratory studyImplementation Science, 2012
- A Compilation of Strategies for Implementing Clinical Innovations in Health and Mental HealthMedical Care Research and Review, 2011
- A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel?Implementation Science, 2010
- Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practiceImplementation Science, 2010
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation scienceImplementation Science, 2009
- Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific methodImplementation Science, 2009
- Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2008
- Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategy Patterns in Veterans Affairs Primary Care ClinicsHealth Services Research, 2006
- Toward Evidence-Based Quality Improvement.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006